IMR R&D · project journal · the catch-up · June 2026
The last journal ended with one lead model at 29/47 on a single harness. Since then the project turned into a real, public capability bench — a dozen models on a live production codebase, a deterministic gate with teeth, and a hard-won lesson about the limits of throwing hardware at the problem. Here’s where things stand.
The board, today
The capability bench is the gauntlet: 33 real bugs from a production Laravel ticketing app, each graded mechanically by the app’s own PHPUnit suite — no soft 0–100 judge, just pass or fail. Twelve models have run it on the frozen v1.6.1 harness. The lead is a lean 35B mixture-of-experts; the tail is still filling in as runs complete.
The result that keeps proving itself
The headline isn’t the leader — it’s the 4-billion-parameter model sitting third, ahead of a 26B and a 80B. With the right scaffolding, capability stops tracking parameter count as tightly as you’d expect. The harness lifts everyone; the model still matters, but the floor moved, and it moved most for the smallest models.
The hardware frontier — and its ceiling
The obvious next question: if scaffolding lifts small models, does a second GPU let us run a much bigger one? We linked two GX10 superchips over a 200 GbE fabric — roughly 256 GB pooled — and tried. The answer was a clean, useful no. Distributing a 35B across both boxes runs at full single-box speed (no penalty), but frontier-size weights don’t fit the way the headline number suggests: a 235B at 8-bit wedges the cluster, its 4-bit shrink loads but sits on the ragged edge of memory and hard-hangs under load, and a 128B contender stalls the same way.
A second box buys context, throughput and redundancy — not “run a model twice the size.” The realistic target is the biggest model that fits one box at 8-bit with room for its context.
The gate got teeth
Before any model reaches the gauntlet it has to clear the gate: 16 deterministic, temperature-zero probes run five times each, scored strict. They’re harness-invariant — pure capability, no scaffolding — covering basic vitals, tool use, output fidelity, and a new fifth group this month: agentic discipline, the habits that decide whether a model can survive an autonomous loop at all.
Closing the loop
And the harness no longer just benches in a clean room — it runs inside the production app. The same engine that scores the gauntlet now drives a development agent live in Paperclip: it picks up a real issue, fetches the context itself, makes the surgical edits, runs the suite, and only reports done when it’s green. The bench and the product finally share one brain.
IMR R&D · project journal · catch-up chapter, June 2026 · numbers pulled live from the v1.6.1 board.